Cpio v subhash chandra agarwal
WebSep 4, 2024 · The CPIO, Supreme Court of India v Subhash Chandra Agarwal & Anr. Pursuant to a Full Court meeting of the Supreme Court in 1997, a resolution was passed requiring that all Judges of the Supreme Court declare their assets to … http://probono-india.in/Indian-Society/Paper/343_Analysis%20of%20CPIO%20v.%20Shubhash%20Chandra%20Agarwal.docx
Cpio v subhash chandra agarwal
Did you know?
WebJan 18, 2024 · This Commission also refers to the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Civil Appeal No. 10044 of 2010 & Ors. dated 13-11-2024 titled as CPIO, Supreme Court of India v. Subhash Chandra Agarwal, wherein, it was observed as follows:- "59. WebIn the modern era, people are more vigil about their rights and they constitute the democracy. So, they expect the government to deliver. Central Public Information Officer, Supreme Court of India v. Subhash Chandra Agarwal, 2024, it was held by the Constitution Bench of Supreme Court that Supreme Court comes under the scope of …
WebApr 17, 2013 · - This writ petition seeks to assail that part of an order dated 7-9-2012, passed by the Central Information Commission (CIC) whereby, a direction has been issued to the petitioner/Ministry of Finance to appoint one CPIO for the Ministry of Finance or in the alternative to nominate any one of the CPIOs, who are presently functioning, as such, in … WebSep 2, 2009 · Facts. In November 2007, the Applicant asked the Central Public Information Officer of the Supreme Court of India (the CPIO) to provide (i) a copy of the 1997 Full Court Resolution which required every judge to declare his/her assets to the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court (CJI); and (ii) information relating to the declaration of the Chief Justices’ …
WebSep 26, 2024 · In the Supreme Court of India Civil appellate jurisdiction Civil appeal no. 10044 of 2010 Appellant Central Public Information Officer; Supreme Court of India Respondents Subhash Chandra Agarwal Date … WebApr 17, 2015 · The CPIO, to whom the said application was transferred under Section 6 (3) of the Act rejected the same by order dated 02.02.2011 on the ground that it is an exempted information under Section 8 (1) (j) of the Act. The appeal preferred by the appellant herein was dismissed by the First Appellate Authority by order dated 07.03.2011.
WebKhanna J authored the majority opinion in the Supreme Court’s RTI judgment. In CPIO, Supreme Court v Subhash Chandra Agarwal, the question before the five-judge Bench was whether subjecting the Office of the Chief Justice (OCJ) to RTI request would curtail the independence of the judiciary.
WebOct 27, 2024 · Supreme Court’s observation in the matter of CPIO, Supreme Court of India v. Subhash Chandra Agarwal,2009 SCC OnLine Del 2714, held that: “There can be no doubt that the Act is premised on disclosure being the norm, and refusal, the exception.” colour inc basingstokeWebHome SUPREME COURT OF INDIA colour in 2 year oldWebthe appellant provided a copy of the resolution dated 7 May 1997, the CPIO declined (by an order dated 30 November 2007) to provide information concerning the declaration of assets by judges of the Supreme Court and the ... 9 The CPIO, Supreme Court of India v Subhash Chandra Agarwal & Anr, Writ Petition (C) 288/2009 10 Appeal no CIC/WB/A/2008/ ... colour inc basingstoke hampshireWebFeb 26, 2024 · IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPEAL NO. 10044 OF 2010 W.P. (C) 288/2009 Petitioner Central Public Information Officer, Supreme Court Of India Respondent Subhash Chandra Agarwal Date of Judgement 13 November, 2024 Bench Ranjan Gogoi, C.J.I; V. Ramana, J.; D.Y. Chandrachud, J.; Deepak Gupta, J.; Sanjiv … colour image for kidsWeb2 days ago · While issuing notice on the petitions in February, the court had noted that a constitutional bench of Supreme Court in CPIO Supreme Court of India v. Subhash Chandra Agarwal held that the... dr tattersall burnley group practiceWebNov 21, 2024 · To start with, in a latest, landmark and extremely laudable judgment titled Central Public Information Officer, Supreme Court Of India vs Subhash Chandra Aggarwal in Civil Appeal No. 10044 of 2010 with Civil Appeal No. 10045 of 2010 and Civil Appeal No. 2683 of 2010, the Supreme Court on November 13 while exercising its civil appellate … colour in a bookmarkWebThe right to know and access information must be weighed with the right to privacy of a person and where the public interest in access to information outweighs the possible harm to privacy, the information must be allowed to be disseminated. dr tattersall michigan city